• Main navigation
Donate
If you would like, you can donate to keep this website alive.

>
Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding
This page consist of inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Virtual Mating" you have entered.
The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database.
For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many as possible of the ancestors are known in the database.
We hope this tool will be valuable to breeders and enthousiasts.
Each information block has an explanation button which can be clicked to find information on that specific subject.
 
Sire (Guy's Hilo v. Norden Stamm) and Dam (Gravin Wietske v. Neêrlands Stam (NHSB 831068))
Name Gender Pups HD
Guy's Hilo v. Norden Stamm655 offspringHD: A-1
Gravin Wietske v. Neêrlands Stam (NHSB 831068)26 offspringHD: A-1
  • Explanation
  •  
    List of common progency of Sire and Dam
    Name Gender Pups HD
    Graaf Aristo v. Neêrlands Stam840 offspringHD: A-1
    Graaf Asch-Martial v. Neerlands Stamno offspringUnknown
    Graaf Atos v. Neerlands Stam50 offspringHD: A-1
    Graaf Donar v. Neerlands Stam (NHSB 1152602)no offspringUnknown
    Graaf Duco v. Neerlands Stamno offspringUnknown
    Gravin Aida v. Neerlands Stamno offspringUnknown
    Gravin Anita v. Neerlands Stam (NHSB 1053463)no offspringUnknown
    Gravin Aranka v. Neerlands Stam20 offspringHD: A-1
    Gravin Arda v. Neerlands Stam1 offspringUnknown
    Gravin Dagmar v. Neerlands Stam21 offspringHD: A-1
  • Explanation
  •  
    Ascendents count
    Total count of known ascendants (over 8 generations : max=510) 504
    Count of distinct known ascendants (over 8 generations) 225
  • Explanation
  •  
    For any animal out of Sire and Dam :
    Coefficient of Inbreeding (this value is low) 7.0927%
  • Explanation
  •  
    Top contributing ascendants :
    Partial inbreeding due to Lump v. Hagenstolz 1.537%
    Partial inbreeding due to Alex v. Kleinwaldheim 1.187%
    Partial inbreeding due to Dieter v. Willersee 0.6%
    Partial inbreeding due to Citto v. Fürstenfeld 0.501%
    Partial inbreeding due to Carmen v. Felsingpass 0.501%
    Partial inbreeding due to Amor v. Haus Bormes 0.364%
    Partial inbreeding due to Igon v. Naunhof 0.273%
    Partial inbreeding due to Alf v. Hagenfreund 0.263%
    Partial inbreeding due to Arco of Fayette Corner 0.195%
    Partial inbreeding due to Alf v.d. Geer 0.165%
    Partial inbreeding due to Bordo v. Fürstenfeld (DZB 75537) 0.16%
    Partial inbreeding due to Addi v. Hagenstolz 0.154%
  • Explanation
  •  
    Most inbred ascendants :
    Peggy v. Hunglbrunn 21.87%
    Lump v. Hagenstolz 19.92%
  • Explanation
  •  
    Statistics for Sire and Dam :
    Coefficient of Relationship between Sire and Dam 12.8548%
    Coefficient of Inbreeding of Sire 11.9853%
    Coefficient of Inbreeding of Dam 8.7403%
  • Explanation
  •  
     
    A word of thanks
    We would like to thank Jacques Le Renard for the algorithms behind this webpage. Jacques has spent many hours perfecting these calculations. Please visit his website E.R.o's Information System