• Main navigation
Donate
If you would like, you can donate to keep this website alive.

>
Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding
This page consist of inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Virtual Mating" you have entered.
The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database.
For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many as possible of the ancestors are known in the database.
We hope this tool will be valuable to breeders and enthousiasts.
Each information block has an explanation button which can be clicked to find information on that specific subject.
 
Sire (Pacha du Kirchberg) and Dam (Urianne des Boucantes)
Name Gender Pups HD
Pacha du Kirchberg7 offspringUnknown
Urianne des Boucantes5 offspringUnknown
  • Explanation
  •  
    List of common progency of Sire and Dam
    Name Gender Pups HD
    Imgo des Boucantesno offspringUnknown
  • Explanation
  •  
    Ascendents count
    Total count of known ascendants (over 8 generations : max=510) 366
    Count of distinct known ascendants (over 8 generations) 167
  • Explanation
  •  
    For any animal out of Sire and Dam :
    Coefficient of Inbreeding (this value is low) 5.6454%
  • Explanation
  •  
    Top contributing ascendants :
    Partial inbreeding due to Citto v. Fürstenfeld 2.041%
    Partial inbreeding due to Carmen v. Felsingpass 0.997%
    Partial inbreeding due to Lump v. Hagenstolz 0.819%
    Partial inbreeding due to Alex v. Kleinwaldheim 0.444%
    Partial inbreeding due to Dieter v. Willersee 0.324%
    Partial inbreeding due to Horst v.d. Bismarcksäule 0.117%
    Partial inbreeding due to Inka v.d. Nordburg 0.101%
    Partial inbreeding due to Frido v. Rauhfelsen 0.099%
    Partial inbreeding due to Addi v. Hagenstolz 0.097%
    Partial inbreeding due to Alf v. Hagenfreund 0.074%
    Partial inbreeding due to Carola v. Südharz 0.073%
    Partial inbreeding due to Artus v. Fürstenlager 0.056%
  • Explanation
  •  
    Most inbred ascendants :
    Lump v. Hagenstolz 19.92%
  • Explanation
  •  
    Statistics for Sire and Dam :
    Coefficient of Relationship between Sire and Dam 10.1552%
    Coefficient of Inbreeding of Sire 23.6148%
    Coefficient of Inbreeding of Dam 0%
  • Explanation
  •  
     
    A word of thanks
    We would like to thank Jacques Le Renard for the algorithms behind this webpage. Jacques has spent many hours perfecting these calculations. Please visit his website E.R.o's Information System